Table of Contents

Distinguishing STEMI vs. Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB)

Diagnosing ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) is challenging because LBBB causes secondary ST-T abnormalities that may mimic or obscure acute ischemia.

Historically, clinicians relied on the Sgarbossa criteria, which have excellent specificity but poor sensitivity. Newer methods such as the Smith-modified Sgarbossa rule drastically improve diagnostic accuracy.

This page summarizes:

Primary References:

Why LBBB Mimics or Obscures STEMI

LBBB causes abnormal ventricular conduction, producing:

Because discordant ST elevation is a normal feature of LBBB, STEMI cannot be diagnosed using standard 1–2 mm ST elevation criteria.

A new or presumed-new LBBB is NOT, by itself, a STEMI equivalent (AHA 2013 update).


I. Classic Sgarbossa Criteria

The original Sgarbossa criteria identify STEMI in LBBB using concordant (same-direction) or “excessively discordant” ST changes.

Criterion Points Description
Concordant ST elevation ≥ 1 mm 5 ST elevation in the same direction as the QRS complex
Concordant ST depression ≥ 1 mm in V1–V3 3 Indicates posterior MI
Discordant ST elevation ≥ 5 mm 2 ST elevation opposite the QRS

Interpretation:

Reference: Sgarbossa EB, NEJM 1996


II. Smith-Modified Sgarbossa Criteria (mSgarbossa)

Dr. Stephen Smith introduced a modification to the third Sgarbossa criterion to improve sensitivity while preserving specificity.

The Modified Rule:

This replaces the outdated “≥5 mm” discordant ST elevation rule.

Diagnostic performance:

Reference: Smith SW et al., Ann Emerg Med 2012


III. Additional Criteria and Principles

A. Proportionality is Key

In normal LBBB, discordant ST elevation is proportionate to QRS amplitude. Excessive ST deviation relative to QRS voltage suggests acute STEMI.

Guiding principles:

B. Concordance Is High-Risk

Any concordant ST elevation or depression is strongly predictive of acute coronary occlusion.

C. Serial ECGs Improve Accuracy

LBBB does not prevent evolution of ischemic changes. Look for:


IV. Comparison Table: STEMI vs LBBB Mimic

Feature Suggests STEMI Suggests LBBB (non-ischemic)
ST elevation Concordant, or disproportionate (>25%) Discordant but proportionate (<25%)
ST depression V1–V3 Concordant depression → Posterior MI Discordant depression common
QRS morphology May be wide but ischemic pattern evolves Classic LBBB pattern stable
T waves Hyperacute or symmetric Secondary inversions typical
Reciprocal changes Present Usually absent
Serial ECG changes Dynamic Stable over time
Sgarbossa/Smith criteria Often positive Negative

V. Applying Sgarbossa and Smith Criteria

A. Concordant ST Elevation (≥1 mm)

B. Concordant ST Depression (V1–V3)

C. Excessively Discordant ST Elevation (Smith Rule)


VI. Practical Approach for Clinicians


VII. Summary Table: Diagnostic Criteria

Criterion Cutoff Meaning
Concordant ST Elevation ≥ 1 mm Strongly suggests acute MI
Concordant ST Depression (V1–V3) ≥ 1 mm Posterior MI
Smith-Modified Discordant ST Elevation ST/S ratio ≤ –0.25 High suspicion for MI
Classic Discordant Elevation (OLD) ≥ 5 mm Low sensitivity; outdated
QRS Duration ≥ 120 ms Required for diagnosing LBBB

VIII. Sample Images

LBBB with No MI

Image to be added soon.

LBBB with Occlusion MI (anterior)

Image to be added soon.


Key Takeaways